Skip to main content

New SDLT Rates Introduced In Autumn Budget - Portner

 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced changes to Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) in the Autumn Budget that have increased the rates payable by buyers of additional properties and companies. Partner Daniel Broughton summarises the current SDLT rates and examines the new rates introduced with effect from 31 October 2024.

Overview of SDLT

SDLT is charged when you buy a residential freehold or leasehold property for a price that exceeds certain thresholds. The current thresholds are:

  • £250,000 for residential property
  • £425,000 for first-time buyers buying residential property worth up to £625,000.

Transactions for a purchase price below these thresholds are exempt, and no SDLT is payable.

The table below sets out the SDLT payable if you are buying a residential property in your personal name and it is the only residential property you own.

Rates up to 31 March 2025

Property or lease premium or transfer value

SDLT rate

Up to £250,000

 Zero

The next £675,000 (the portion from £250,001 to £925,000)

 5%

The next £575,000 (the portion from £925,001 to £1.5m)

 10%

The remaining amount (the portion above £1.5m)

 12%

These rates are changing from 1 April 2025 and from this date will be as follows:

Rates from 1 April 2025

Property or lease premium or transfer value

SDLT rate

Up to £125,000

Zero

The next £125,000 (the portion from £125,001 to £250,000)

2%

The next £675,000 (the portion from £250,001 to £925,000)

5%

The next £575,000 (the portion from £925,001 to £1.5m)

10%

The remaining amount (the portion above £1.5m)

12%

First-time buyer’s relief

First-time buyers buying before 31 March 2025 will pay no SDLT up to £425,000 and 5% SDLT on the portion from £425,001 to £625,000. If the price exceeds £625,000, you cannot claim first-time buyer relief.

From 1 April 2025, the relief changes, and first-time buyers will pay no SDLT up to £300,000 and 5% SDLT on the portion from £300,001 to £500,000. You will not be able to claim the relief if the price is more than £500,000.

Higher SDLT rates for buyers of additional properties and companies

If you buy a residential property for more than £40,000 after 31 October 2024 and before 1 April 2025 and it is not your only residential property, you must pay a 5% SDLT surcharge on the standard SDLT (as set out below). Before the Autumn Budget, the surcharge was 3%.

The same surcharge applies to companies and other non-natural persons (such as partnerships) buying property up to £500,000. On purchases over £500,000, companies pay a single rate of 17% (up from 15%).

Consideration

SDLT rate

Up to £250,000

 5%

So much as exceeds £250,000 but does not exceed £925,000

 10%

So much as exceeds £925,000 but does not exceed £1.5m

 15%

The remainder (if any)

 17%

For such transactions on or after 1 April 2025, the rates are as follows:

Consideration

SDLT rate 

Up to £125,000

 5%

So much as exceeds £125,000 but does not exceed £250,000

 7%

So much as exceeds £250,000 but does not exceed £925,000

 10%

So much as exceeds £925,000 but does not exceed £1.5m

 15%

The remainder (if any)

 17%

Purpose of the SDLT increases

The government expects the higher rates of SDLT payable on purchases of residential property to “disincentivise the acquisition of second homes and buy-to-let properties, freeing up housing stock for main home and first-time buyers”. Whether this will be the case in practice and what impact this has on an already competitive rental market remains to be seen.

If you have any queries regarding SDLT on residential property, please contact Daniel Broughton at dbr@portner.co.uk

For more information visit our website: https://www.portner.co.uk/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

High Court Rescinds Purchase Of £32.5m Mansion Due To Seller’s Fraudulent Misrepresentation - Portner

  The High Court has ruled in favour of buyers who sought rescission and damages for fraudulent misrepresentation in their purchase of a £32.5m million mansion in Notting Hill. Partner Daniel Broughton examines the decision in Patarkatsishvili and another v Woodward-Fisher [2025] EWHC 265 (Ch), which underscores the vital importance of giving honest disclosures to enquiries in property transactions.​ Background Iya Patarkatsishvili and her husband, Dr Yevhen Hunyak, purchased Horbury Villa, a Victorian mansion in Notting Hill, from developer Mr William Woodward-Fisher for £32.5m in May 2019. Shortly after moving in, they discovered a severe infestation of clothes moths that had not been apparent during pre-contract inspections. Investigations revealed that the infestation originated from woollen insulation installed during renovations between 2012 and 2013. Pre-contract enquiries and misrepresentations Before the sale, Mr Woodward-Fisher responded to standard pre-contra...

Local Authorities Given New Powers To Auction Empty Shops In Bid To Revitalise High Streets - Portner

  The government has granted power to local authorities to “breathe new life back into high streets and transform long-term empty shops”. High Street Rental Auctions (HSRAs) will enable local authorities to tackle persistently vacant properties by putting empty shop leases up for auction. Partner Mitchell Griver examines the new proposals. The government says UK high streets have been neglected for too long, resulting in one in seven high street shops currently being closed. It has committed to “revitalise town centres and bring thriving high streets back for good”. Under new rules that came into force on 2 December 2024, councils will be able to step in and auction one-to-five-year leases of “qualifying high street premises” that have been empty for more than 365 days in the previous two years. Qualifying high-street premises “Qualifying high-street premises” are premises the local authority considers suitable for “high-street use” situated in a designated high street o...

Barrister Who Cited Five Fake Cases In Legal Proceedings Suspected Of Using AI - Portner

  A judge has accused a barrister and solicitor of “appalling professional misbehaviour” in relation to the citation of five fake cases in a statement of facts and trying to dismiss these as “minor citation errors”. It was suggested in the judgment that the fake cases may have been referenced due to the barrister using artificial intelligence. Partner Alex Williams reviews the case of Ayinde, R v The London Borough of Haringey and discusses the use of AI in legal research and drafting. Judgment in Ayinde The case involved judicial review proceedings in which the barrister for the claimant, Sarah Forey, lodged written submissions that referred to five cases that did not exist. When asked by the defendant’s solicitors to provide copies of the judgments, the claimant’s solicitors failed to do so, did not admit the cases were made up and said references to them were merely “cosmetic errors” that could be “easily explained”. The judge concluded that this assertion was “a grossly ...